|
Judges' Award-Construction - International
Terminal D
Submitted
by: DFW Airport
Location: DFW Airport
Logistically, International Terminal D was essentially landlocked
within DFW Airport property. And it was virtually a Greenfield
site.
The site is adjoined by an operating airfield on the north
and west, an airport public service road on the east that
was ultimately rerouted and reconstructed, and an operating
DFW Airport parking lot on the south. That meant that a multiphased
plan for many project logistical requirements had to be developed.
Beginning with the 2 million-cu.-yd. site excavation and
ending with project punch-list completion, logistical planning
played an enormous role in Terminal D's success.
A newly constructed roadway was required to provide access
to the Terminal D site for workers, site administration and
material deliveries. The new Skylink automated people-mover
system was structurally integrated into Terminal D.
The main theater section is wrapped in red sandstone, taking
a cue from the walls of nearby Palo Duro Canyon. The three-level
wing running the length of the center's north side is clad
in yellow brick that also reflects the local natural palette,
and contains administrative offices, dressing rooms and staging
areas. And there's a two-story, acoustically isolated rehearsal
room that serves as a children's education center and mechanical
and electrical equipment on its third floor.
DFW originally awarded the Skylink construction separately
to another contractor, but the decision to have Austin Commercial
perform all Skylink structural construction within the Terminal
D footprint eased coordination and sequencing burdens upfront.
The terrorist attacks on Sept. 11, 2001, slightly more than
a year after the start of construction of Terminal D, brought
new obstacles for the project, which had progressed well toward
the completion of the mass excavation and site demolition
phase prior to the attacks. And, construction of foundations,
which covered a 650,000-sq.-ft. area and the seven-level superstructure,
had built momentum.
But the uncertainty of the airline industry immediately threw
doubt into the project's viability. Scenarios for potential
project shutdown and cancellation were developed.
Although the construction progress was stymied, it did not
stop. The general contractor continued with the existing structural
design and its prescribed installation through January 2002,
when new federal design criteria began being issued.
Terminal D's structure was then re-evaluated. The initial
10,000 tons of steel originally required increased to 12,500
tons. Initial reviews resulted in areas of the current structure
being put on hold pending further design criteria evolvement
and the subsequent redesign.
The previous schedule momentum and sequence plan were no longer
applicable. A short-term, rolling schedule, which assigned
and sequenced work areas that were not on hold, was utilized
to keep construction crews productive and onsite.
The 650,000-sq.-ft. foundation footprint and Terminal D's
seven levels became a day-to-day planning task and challenge.
Throughout 2002, Terminal D's superstructure took on a new,
stouter signature. A 2-ft.-thick concrete blast wall was added.
It ran the length of the terminal's service level.
Structural-steel roof trusses increased in weight and size
and had to be redrawn and, in some cases, refabricated. Even
with the redesign and refabrication, the pre-Sept. 11 schedule
milestone for the setting of the first roof trusses was met
in September 2002.
As new designs were issued for areas of Terminal D's structure
not yet built, designs to retrofit areas already constructed
were also being generated. Changes and additions included
adding steel jackets to wrap already installed concrete columns,
full-length steel angles at the tops of walls and steel bollards
on landside roadways to keep vehicles from driving into the
terminal.
Day-by-day resequencing evolved into week-by-week planning.
The hands-on approach minimized the impact of the almost year-long
setback in design, and there was only a 60-day push on the
construction schedule's end date.
Another temporary delay due to Sept. 11 was the onsite implosion
of the existing Hyatt Hotel West Tower. The implosion was
part of the site demolition to accommodate the site plan for
Terminal D.
The explosives to be utilized for the implosion were en route
to DFW Airport on Sept. 11, but the specially permitted load
was turned around and the implosion was delayed. After much
review, coordination and education, the implosion took place
Oct. 7, 2001.
Opportunities for innovative approaches to construction and
the associated processes were numerous during the five-year
duration of the program.
From the conceptual planning stage when the terminal grew
from 1 million sq. ft. to 2 million sq. ft., to the challenges
of Sept. 11 and the opening of Terminal D in July, innovation
was the rule, not the exception.
Access logistics in the heart of the site took hours of analysis
and sequencing planning sessions. Tower-crane size and placement
along with mobile-crane supplementation resulted in the use
of 13 tower cranes over the program's duration.
Each tower crane's location, size and utilized duration was
planned to minimize the need for mobile-support cranes and
was coordinated with DFW Airport and the FAA so as not to
interfere with airport operations.
Final structural construction phases for the terminal, parking
garage and terminal roadways were one of the most critical
logistical coordination challenges of the project. Two structural
bays were left out of the terminal until after the parking
garage was in place.
|
Key Players
|
| Owner: |
Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport |
| Construction Manager
at Risk: |
Austin Commercial Inc., Dallas |
| Architect of Record: |
Corgan Associates Inc., Dallas |
| Lead Design Architect: |
HNTB Cos., Kansas City, Mo.
|
| Parking Garage Architect of Record:
|
Gresham Smith and Partners, Dallas |
| Structural Engineer: |
L.A. Fuess Partners Inc., Dallas |
| Civil Engineers: |
Carter & Burgess Inc., Fort Worth, and LOPEZGARCIA
GROUP, Dallas |
| MEP Engineers: |
Friberg Associates Inc., Fort Worth, and Blum Consulting
Engineers Inc., Dallas |
|