Houston
Project Making Use Of High Volume Fly Ash Concrete
New UT Health Science Center Facility Hopes
To Earn LEED Certification
By Mark Rea
When the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
planned to build a new School of Nursing and Student Community
Center, the university wanted it to be an environmentally
friendly facility.
As a result, the $57 million multipurpose million building
is being constructed under the U.S. Green Building Council's
Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design requirements,
including extensive use of high volume fly ash concrete.
The joint venture of Houston-area firms Jacobs Engineering
and Vaughn Construction is serving as construction manager
at risk for the project.
Fly ash is a byproduct of coal-burning power plants. A limited
amount of fly ash has been utilized in the production of concrete
for years, Vaughn Construction structural estimator Lenny
Enderle said that many structural engineers have historically
allowed up to 25 percent of the cementituous materials in
concrete to be fly ash.
"Ready mix concrete producers require the use of fly
ash to produce the higher-strength concrete that is becoming
more and more common in larger projects," Enderle said.
"However, even though cement production has fallen behind
demand, the majority of fly ash produced in the United States
is disposed of in landfills. It makes much more sense to use
a valuable product rather than throw it away."
The original goal of UTHSC was for the concrete to contain
a minimum of 51 percent fly ash. For nearly two years beginning
in 2000, using input from the owner, project architects, structural
engineers, quality control personnel from Houston-area ready
mix suppliers and concrete consultants from the University
of Texas, more than 50 different mixes were tested.
Mixtures ranged in cement content from 4.75 sacks to 9.25
sacks in 0.75-sack intervals. They also ranged in fly ash
content from 30 percent in the 4.75- to 7-sack mixes to 65
percent in the 7- to 9.25-sack mixes. Low and medium dosages
of midrange water reducers and normal dosages of high-range
water reducers were scattered throughout the testing plan.
Carbon dioxide ratings were also given to each mix based on
a study conducted for the project by the Austin-based Center
for Maximum Potential Building Systems.
Strength tests were then conducted at intervals of one, two,
three, four, seven, 14, 28 and 56 days. Concrete was batched
at the Hanson Concrete plant in Houston with Houston-based
testing agent PSI conducting early stage testing at Hanson's
testing facility. Later-stage cylinder breaks were performed
at PSI's laboratory.
After the 28-day strength results were obtained, mixes with
the best test results were chosen for retesting.
"Several mixes had their water cement ratios' modified
to quantify the impact of additional water while others were
retested with different water reducing agents," Enderle
said.
Quality control personnel from Houston-based TXI Concrete
also agreed to conduct tests of the same or similar mixes
at one of the company's batch plant facilities.
Concrete Specs
For the School of Nursing and Student Center project - an
eight-story, 187,011-sq.-ft. classroom building and a two-story,
8,150-sq.-ft. service building - engineers determined the
most practical way to issue the concrete specifications was
to specify minimum fly ash percentage requirements to the
various concrete elements based on the test results obtained.
"Though testing revealed strength requirements could
be met in a 28-day time frame, due to slower strength gains
expected with the various fly ash mixes, strength requirements
were changed to 56 days," Enderle said.
The classroom building is being constructed on a site previously
occupied by a drainage channel, and the foundation required
a 5-ft.-thick mat with drilled straight shaft piers in certain
areas below the old site drainage channels. Flat deck slabs
supported by exposed round columns and shear walls comprise
the structure.
The service building is designed as a structural steel building
with slabs supported on metal deck over bell-bottom pier foundation
elements.
The mat foundation consists of more than 5,200 cu. yds. of
5,000-psi concrete with 60 percent fly ash., while a 2,500-psi
seal slab was poured below the mat and contains 30 percent
fly ash. Piers were specified for a 65-percent fly ash requirement
and a 4,000-psi mixture.
Walls and columns are 50 percent fly ash with 5,000- to 6,000-psi
mixes, while metal decks over structural steel framing have
3,000-psi slabs containing 30 percent fly ash because of the
minimal amount of concrete involved and because of the relationship
of the slabs to the work of other trades, Specifications for
the elevated slab and beam members proved more complex. "These
required a hard trowel finish thereby requiring that the initial
set time be as close as possible to conventional mixes,"
Enderle said.
With Vaughn Construction acting as the concrete subcontractor
to the Jacobs-Vaughn joint venture, piers were drilled with
the use of a 65-percent high volume fly ash concrete mix.
The mat foundation was placed in a single June 2002 pour from
midnight to 3 p.m. and utilized five Putzmeister concrete
boom pumps.
"Unlike conventional mat pours, this one was brought
up to final elevation gradually over the entire 28,500-sq.-ft.
mat area," Enderle said. "This shortened the time
frame to three hours that any portion of the top surface would
be exposed before the flooding operation could occur."
TXI supplied the mat pour from four separate batch plants.
Cost Comparisons
Enderle said concrete material prices received on the project
were all within $1 per cu. yd. of those received on similar
projects bid in the Houston area within the time frame of
the project.
"Placement costs on the project were not significantly
different than those of conventional mixes," he added.
"However, set times for slabs were two to three hours
longer than with conventional concrete mixes in warm weather
and even longer in the fall and winter months. Overall finishing
costs were estimated at approximately 15 percent higher than
on conventional mixes."
The longer set times also required use of evaporation control
measures consisting of misting equipment and evaporation control
compounds. The misting equipment was a one-time cost item
with only minimal setup cost requirements for each pour. The
evaporation control compounds added an additional 4 to 5 cents
per sq. ft. of slab area. Curing costs are not significantly
different than those on conventional concrete mixes.
Extended set times also required the mobilization and rental
of an additional set of column and wall forms than would have
been required. Also, an extra construction joint was added
to each floor so additional soffit materials would not be
required.
Formwork costs associated with the use of high volume fly
ash concrete were approximately 2 percent higher than traditional
concrete.
Enderle added that the overall cost of the concrete construction
portion of the project was approximately 1.3 percent higher
due to the use of fly ash in the mixes. "On future projects,
however, actual savings may be realized as concrete vendor
prices reflect the material savings achieved and engineer
designs realize the significant strength differentials from
those of conventional mixes," he said.
Once the project is complete next spring, the university hopes
the facility will receive gold certification under the LEED
program. In addition to the extensive use of fly ash concrete,
the facility will also feature several innovative design concepts,
including rooftop rainwater collection, a "green"
roof planted with grass and other foliage, a future photo-voltaic
system to supplement power usage and use of natural light
and reflective surfaces for light direction at work surfaces.
Additionally, the facility's exterior will feature reclaimed
brick from a 100-year-old building as well as "floating"
stairwells, which will be visible through the glass curtainwall.
The School of Nursing and Student Community Center will finally
offer nursing students a campus facility of their own.
"Over the years, our nursing students and faculty have
worked in places that were borrowed or rented, not a place
that you could identify as a nursing school," said Dr.
James T. Willerson, president of the University of Texas Health
Science Center at Houston. "Nevertheless, our school
is ranked in the top 10 percent of graduate nursing schools
in the country. Imagine what may happen once we are in our
new facility."
| PROJECT
TEAM |
| CONSTRUCTION
MANAGER : |
A joint venture of Jacobs Engineering
and Vaughn Construction, Houston |
| LOCATION: |
Houston |
| OWNER: |
The University of Texas System,
Austin |
| ARCHITECT: |
Berkebile Nelson Immenschuh McDowell,
Kansas City, Mo. |
| ASSOCIATE ARCHITECT: |
Lake/Flato Architects, San Antonio |
| STRUCTURAL ENGINEER:
|
Jaster-Quintanilla & Associates,
Austin |
| GEOTECHNICAL
ENGINEER : |
Ulrich Engineers, Houston |
| CONCRETE SUPPLIER:
|
TXI Concrete, Houston |
|